<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The 5 Types of Online Content</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.emediastrategist.com/blog/the-5-types-of-online-content/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.emediastrategist.com/blog/the-5-types-of-online-content/</link>
	<description>Personal blog of Eric Shanfelt, Online Business Strategist</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 06 Jul 2011 13:57:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric</title>
		<link>http://www.emediastrategist.com/blog/the-5-types-of-online-content/comment-page-1/#comment-19598</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Aug 2007 15:33:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.emediastrategist.com/blog/?p=62#comment-19598</guid>
		<description>Hi Frank. I would group that together with content type #1 -- editorially generated. Even though articles and blogs may be written by authors not on the publication staff, they are still commissioned and/or edited by publication staff. In essence, they are contributing authors and adjunct staff to your magazine. I also agree that blogs don&#039;t really count as UGC with the exception of the abilities for readers to comment / feedback ... just like you&#039;ve been doing on my blog.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Frank. I would group that together with content type #1 &#8212; editorially generated. Even though articles and blogs may be written by authors not on the publication staff, they are still commissioned and/or edited by publication staff. In essence, they are contributing authors and adjunct staff to your magazine. I also agree that blogs don&#8217;t really count as UGC with the exception of the abilities for readers to comment / feedback &#8230; just like you&#8217;ve been doing on my blog.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frank</title>
		<link>http://www.emediastrategist.com/blog/the-5-types-of-online-content/comment-page-1/#comment-19505</link>
		<dc:creator>Frank</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Aug 2007 16:44:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.emediastrategist.com/blog/?p=62#comment-19505</guid>
		<description>Eric,

I would add a 6th -- or at least expand upon one type of content that falls between types 1, 2 and 3 (and I don&#039;t think falls into your titles of 4 or 5)

I might call it something like Staff Edited Content or sometimes called Contributed Edit.  

This type of content will edited/reviewed by a member of the publication&#039;s staff, but would carry the byline of the actual author.  It could take the form of single articles being contributed, and editorial feature/series or and could also be a non-staff blogger (I would consider a staff blog part of your item 1) who has a regular blog on your site.  (I don&#039;t really think the blogs fit in #2)

Its not really user generated content since there is a production/review process in place for it, but it isn&#039;t editorially generated, at least how you&#039;re defining the term.

Thoughts?  Or would you combine this in one of your existing categories?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Eric,</p>
<p>I would add a 6th &#8212; or at least expand upon one type of content that falls between types 1, 2 and 3 (and I don&#8217;t think falls into your titles of 4 or 5)</p>
<p>I might call it something like Staff Edited Content or sometimes called Contributed Edit.  </p>
<p>This type of content will edited/reviewed by a member of the publication&#8217;s staff, but would carry the byline of the actual author.  It could take the form of single articles being contributed, and editorial feature/series or and could also be a non-staff blogger (I would consider a staff blog part of your item 1) who has a regular blog on your site.  (I don&#8217;t really think the blogs fit in #2)</p>
<p>Its not really user generated content since there is a production/review process in place for it, but it isn&#8217;t editorially generated, at least how you&#8217;re defining the term.</p>
<p>Thoughts?  Or would you combine this in one of your existing categories?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

