<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: My Search History &#8211; Google Moving Into Behvioral Targeting?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.emediastrategist.com/blog/my-search-history-google-moving-into-behvioral-targeting/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.emediastrategist.com/blog/my-search-history-google-moving-into-behvioral-targeting/</link>
	<description>Personal blog of Eric Shanfelt, Online Business Strategist</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 10 Jun 2010 14:30:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric Shanfelt</title>
		<link>http://www.emediastrategist.com/blog/my-search-history-google-moving-into-behvioral-targeting/comment-page-1/#comment-3</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric Shanfelt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 May 2006 18:28:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.emediastrategist.com/blog/?p=3#comment-3</guid>
		<description>You certainly hit one of the big ifs in your article â€” will users allow Google to do this â€” and of course the other big if is will advertisers and Googleâ€™s AFC partners allow behavioral targeting. I think they will if the ROI is there.

The final problem is with behavioral targeting in general. Itâ€™s not just the personâ€™s demographics that are important when targeting advertising, but the personâ€™s active role and mindset. Most of my waking life, Iâ€™m an emedia guy and interested in all things about emedia. But Iâ€™m also a pilot, husband, home owner, and musician. When Iâ€™m in those roles/mindsets, I donâ€™t think Iâ€™m as likely to respond to emedia-related info and advertising (although this would be an interesting test). I think it has yet to be proven if behavioral targeting works well enough to overcome those role/mindset barriers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You certainly hit one of the big ifs in your article â€” will users allow Google to do this â€” and of course the other big if is will advertisers and Googleâ€™s AFC partners allow behavioral targeting. I think they will if the ROI is there.</p>
<p>The final problem is with behavioral targeting in general. Itâ€™s not just the personâ€™s demographics that are important when targeting advertising, but the personâ€™s active role and mindset. Most of my waking life, Iâ€™m an emedia guy and interested in all things about emedia. But Iâ€™m also a pilot, husband, home owner, and musician. When Iâ€™m in those roles/mindsets, I donâ€™t think Iâ€™m as likely to respond to emedia-related info and advertising (although this would be an interesting test). I think it has yet to be proven if behavioral targeting works well enough to overcome those role/mindset barriers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Berkowitz</title>
		<link>http://www.emediastrategist.com/blog/my-search-history-google-moving-into-behvioral-targeting/comment-page-1/#comment-2</link>
		<dc:creator>David Berkowitz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 May 2006 18:27:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.emediastrategist.com/blog/?p=3#comment-2</guid>
		<description>Eric, thanks for your thoughtful response.

Hereâ€™s the big counter-question: Can Google get away with selling behavioral? And would it even work? Letâ€™s take your example â€“ a fine one at that, and one thatâ€™s very plausible. If the personâ€™s searching for model airplanes, all that matters for that person is he wants a new tail piece or glue gun or fan site. Heâ€™s not looking for legal advice then, so why would he tolerate being served an ad thatâ€™s not in line with completing his mission?

This is where search turns other ad models on their ear. You can do behavioral targeting for display ads because the ads are far enough removed from what people are doing. Theyâ€™re the sacrifice people make for free content (or not even, in the case of sites like WSJ.com).

Behavioral targeting could come up with contextual â€“ thus, Gmail, and Googleâ€™s AdSense network, and Googleâ€™s image ad network thatâ€™s just now coming to fruition. Contextual works more along the same principals as banner ads than search. A behavioral twist to it could happen, not without significant controversy though.

Alright, Iâ€™ve ranted enough â€“ but I love these types of discussions.
__________________
David Berkowitz
Director of Marketing
icrossing, inc.
www.icrossing.com
www.reversedirectmarketing.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Eric, thanks for your thoughtful response.</p>
<p>Hereâ€™s the big counter-question: Can Google get away with selling behavioral? And would it even work? Letâ€™s take your example â€“ a fine one at that, and one thatâ€™s very plausible. If the personâ€™s searching for model airplanes, all that matters for that person is he wants a new tail piece or glue gun or fan site. Heâ€™s not looking for legal advice then, so why would he tolerate being served an ad thatâ€™s not in line with completing his mission?</p>
<p>This is where search turns other ad models on their ear. You can do behavioral targeting for display ads because the ads are far enough removed from what people are doing. Theyâ€™re the sacrifice people make for free content (or not even, in the case of sites like WSJ.com).</p>
<p>Behavioral targeting could come up with contextual â€“ thus, Gmail, and Googleâ€™s AdSense network, and Googleâ€™s image ad network thatâ€™s just now coming to fruition. Contextual works more along the same principals as banner ads than search. A behavioral twist to it could happen, not without significant controversy though.</p>
<p>Alright, Iâ€™ve ranted enough â€“ but I love these types of discussions.<br />
__________________<br />
David Berkowitz<br />
Director of Marketing<br />
icrossing, inc.<br />
<a href="http://www.icrossing.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.icrossing.com</a><br />
<a href="http://www.reversedirectmarketing.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.reversedirectmarketing.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
