<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>eMedia Strategist &#187; Rich Media &amp; Ad Trafficking</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.emediastrategist.com/blog/category/ad-trafficking-rich-media/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.emediastrategist.com/blog</link>
	<description>Personal blog of Eric Shanfelt, Online Business Strategist</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 Sep 2010 22:10:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Think Flash Ads Show in All Browsers? Think Again.</title>
		<link>http://www.emediastrategist.com/blog/think-flash-ads-show-in-all-browsers-think-again/</link>
		<comments>http://www.emediastrategist.com/blog/think-flash-ads-show-in-all-browsers-think-again/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Apr 2010 21:32:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Eric</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Rich Media & Ad Trafficking]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.emediastrategist.com/blog/?p=283</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Two steps forward, one step back &#8230; gotta love the web and online advertising! There is a proliferation of new computers that run 64-bit processors and 64-bit versions of operating systems (Linux and Windows). Along with that comes all of the wonderful new 64-bit applications &#8230; like Internet Explorer. But Adobe Flash does not yet [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.emediastrategist.com/blog/think-flash-ads-show-in-all-browsers-think-again/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Has Google Crossed the Ethical Line Too?</title>
		<link>http://www.emediastrategist.com/blog/has-google-crossed-the-ethical-line-too/</link>
		<comments>http://www.emediastrategist.com/blog/has-google-crossed-the-ethical-line-too/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 May 2007 13:51:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Eric</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Editorial & Content]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rich Media & Ad Trafficking]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.emediastrategist.com/blog/?p=52</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There&#8217;s an interesting debate going on in my last blog entry about Ziff&#8217;s use of IntelliTXT over whether in-article hyperlink ads are ethical or not. I&#8217;m surprised that I haven&#8217;t heard much about it, but Google also quietly launched their own version of IntelliTXT in late March asÂ part ofÂ their new pay-per-action beta test for AdWords. [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.emediastrategist.com/blog/has-google-crossed-the-ethical-line-too/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Give Ziff Davis a Break</title>
		<link>http://www.emediastrategist.com/blog/give-ziff-davis-a-break/</link>
		<comments>http://www.emediastrategist.com/blog/give-ziff-davis-a-break/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 May 2007 03:32:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Eric</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Editorial & Content]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rich Media & Ad Trafficking]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.emediastrategist.com/blog/?p=51</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I have the utmost respect for Paul Conley and think he is one of the true class acts in media. It is well-known, however, that he and I disagree on the use of in-text ads &#8230; particularly Vibrant Media&#8217;s IntelliTXT product. Paul believes that there is no place for these kinds of ads on any [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.emediastrategist.com/blog/give-ziff-davis-a-break/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>17</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Comedic Ad and Content Collisions</title>
		<link>http://www.emediastrategist.com/blog/33/</link>
		<comments>http://www.emediastrategist.com/blog/33/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Mar 2007 12:37:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Eric</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Rich Media & Ad Trafficking]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.emediastrategist.com/blog/?p=33</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Michael Madej, a friend of mine at IndustryWeek, has a knack forÂ finding the funny side of onlineÂ media. He sent me these screenshots showing the sometimes humorous and ironic juxtaposition of content and online advertising. He assures me these are 100% authentic andÂ notÂ doctored up. Enjoy! Unfortunate ad placement for United Economy Plus Subject says one thing [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.emediastrategist.com/blog/33/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Does Irritating Readers Really Pay?</title>
		<link>http://www.emediastrategist.com/blog/does-irritating-readers-really-pay/</link>
		<comments>http://www.emediastrategist.com/blog/does-irritating-readers-really-pay/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jun 2006 23:24:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Eric</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Rich Media & Ad Trafficking]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.emediastrategist.com/blog/?p=18</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Just saw a post at Techdirt, &#8220;Advertisers Thrilled About New Ways To Irritate Readers&#8221; Though the rise of pop-up blockers is a clear indication that users don&#8217;t like intrusive advertising, publishers haven&#8217;t stopped looking for ways to annoy their readers. The trade magazines tend to be chief offenders as they often employ the dreaded dog-ear [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.emediastrategist.com/blog/does-irritating-readers-really-pay/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

