<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: An Easy Way to Publish Media Kits</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.emediastrategist.com/blog/an-easy-way-to-publish-media-kits/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.emediastrategist.com/blog/an-easy-way-to-publish-media-kits/</link>
	<description>Personal blog of Eric Shanfelt, Online Business Strategist</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 06 Jul 2011 13:57:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric</title>
		<link>http://www.emediastrategist.com/blog/an-easy-way-to-publish-media-kits/comment-page-1/#comment-65330</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Sep 2008 21:18:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.emediastrategist.com/blog/?p=75#comment-65330</guid>
		<description>Zmags, Texterity, NXTbook, Olive, even Zinio ... they&#039;re all good digital magazine based systems. But honestly, I think they&#039;re overkill for media kits and sales sheets. Why pay for that when iPaper is free? Now, if you want to add video to your media kit or if you want some snazzy DRM to collect registration for a media kit, then yes, it pays to look at a more robust system. But for nearly every publisher I&#039;ve worked with over the past 10 years, a solution like iPaper works just fine.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Zmags, Texterity, NXTbook, Olive, even Zinio &#8230; they&#8217;re all good digital magazine based systems. But honestly, I think they&#8217;re overkill for media kits and sales sheets. Why pay for that when iPaper is free? Now, if you want to add video to your media kit or if you want some snazzy DRM to collect registration for a media kit, then yes, it pays to look at a more robust system. But for nearly every publisher I&#8217;ve worked with over the past 10 years, a solution like iPaper works just fine.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Keith Gregory</title>
		<link>http://www.emediastrategist.com/blog/an-easy-way-to-publish-media-kits/comment-page-1/#comment-59374</link>
		<dc:creator>Keith Gregory</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2008 03:36:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.emediastrategist.com/blog/?p=75#comment-59374</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the plug on Aviation Week! 

I don&#039;t think I have ever talked with a marketing manager that enjoyed working on media kits or sales sheets for that matter- and many publishers have too many of those.

Definitely a neat service.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the plug on Aviation Week! </p>
<p>I don&#8217;t think I have ever talked with a marketing manager that enjoyed working on media kits or sales sheets for that matter- and many publishers have too many of those.</p>
<p>Definitely a neat service.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joakim Ditlev</title>
		<link>http://www.emediastrategist.com/blog/an-easy-way-to-publish-media-kits/comment-page-1/#comment-48335</link>
		<dc:creator>Joakim Ditlev</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 May 2008 09:42:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.emediastrategist.com/blog/?p=75#comment-48335</guid>
		<description>First of all: Nice blog you are running here, Eric. It&#039;s already added to the blogroll of my &lt;a href=&quot;http://blog.zmags.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;newborn blog&lt;/a&gt;.

I totally agree with you that PDF is slow and challenging when presenting publications online. But to me the Scribd solution is not much of a difference, when it comes to usability and preserving the look-and-feel from a physical issue. 

At Zmags we came up with another alternative to PDF. It exceeds the capabilities of Ipaper and is much more user-friendly (in all respect). 

From an online strategist point of view this area is worth digging into. Depending on the business and publication type these online issues can be used strategically to bring down production and ditribution costs by lowering the circulation of the printed version. Or online issues can serve as another source of revenue for magazine publishers, who can offer linked interactive ads in their online magazines. 

Using Scribd is just scribing the surface of the benefits with e-publishing. 
I hope to read some more about this rapidly growing business area here.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>First of all: Nice blog you are running here, Eric. It&#8217;s already added to the blogroll of my <a href="http://blog.zmags.com" rel="nofollow">newborn blog</a>.</p>
<p>I totally agree with you that PDF is slow and challenging when presenting publications online. But to me the Scribd solution is not much of a difference, when it comes to usability and preserving the look-and-feel from a physical issue. </p>
<p>At Zmags we came up with another alternative to PDF. It exceeds the capabilities of Ipaper and is much more user-friendly (in all respect). </p>
<p>From an online strategist point of view this area is worth digging into. Depending on the business and publication type these online issues can be used strategically to bring down production and ditribution costs by lowering the circulation of the printed version. Or online issues can serve as another source of revenue for magazine publishers, who can offer linked interactive ads in their online magazines. </p>
<p>Using Scribd is just scribing the surface of the benefits with e-publishing.<br />
I hope to read some more about this rapidly growing business area here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

